Comments for The Angry Atheist

Comment on The Angry Atheist 74 w/ Moron Watch by Reap

Reap — Sun, 06 May 2012 19:44:35 +0000

I’m just glad SOMEBODY got the joke. I always thought the show was an indication of how mindless TV could be although I liked John Ritter as an actor….in other things

Comment on The Angry Atheist 74 w/ Moron Watch by Rob

Rob — Sun, 06 May 2012 18:14:03 +0000

Your guest didn’t get your reference to “Three’s Company” as I doubt it was ever shown in the UK. Besides, it was a shameless ripoff of a Britcom called “Man About the House” that actually was funny! LOL

Comment on The Angry Atheist 77 w/ Ernest Perce The Saints Revenge by Uhh-clem

Uhh-clem — Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:10:13 +0000

Sorry, couldn’t finish it. This guy is not only anti-atheism, he’s exquisitely boring.

I look forward to your future podcasts.

Comment on The Angry Atheist 76 w/ Emily Dietle by Randy

Randy — Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:52:02 +0000

Good one…the philosopher was good, but he made my head hurt!

Comment on The Angry Atheist 76 w/ Emily Dietle by Kim Marie

Kim Marie — Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:13:36 +0000

I was the same age (5 yrs old) when I realized santa was BS… I confronted my parents…Mom, Dad…why does santa and mommy have the same handwriting…. lol

Comment on The Angry Atheist 56 w/ Cognitive Dissonance by Reap

Reap — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:27:00 +0000

I am really much too busy to play games with you. You asked a question, I answered in a way I hoped would make my opinion/thoughts clear to you. If I failed then it is unfortunate but it is something I can live with. I don’t know what your obsession is with illusion/delusion, you can’t trust your brain to always be honest with itself. This is yet another unfortunate fact but it is something you will have to live with. Good luck

Comment on The Angry Atheist 56 w/ Cognitive Dissonance by Marius de Jess

Marius de Jess — Sat, 14 Apr 2012 17:36:25 +0000

In your words:

“Selection isn’t really selection, there is no intelligence making choices as to survival. Selection refers to the effect of mutation. The nose in the middle of your face is a result of mutation and the environment it is not an example of order it just is. I’m no biologist so I can only say this is the way I understand it.”

There are several statements.

Suppose if I may you choose one statement that is the most important one you want to convey to readers.

Here are the following statements from your words above:

1. “Selection isn’t really selection,

2. there is no intelligence making choices as to survival.

3. Selection refers to the effect of mutation.

4. The nose in the middle of your face is a result of mutation

5. and the environment it is not an example of order it just is.

6. I’m no biologist so

7. I can only say this is the way I understand it.”

Or if you prefer what is the one thought foremost in your heart and mind in your series of statements above? Make that one thought very sharp, precise, concise, and clear.

The way I understand your series of statements above, you are stating in effect that there is no order in life or in a living thing, it is all in effect delusion or illusion.

Marius de Jess

Comment on The Angry Atheist 56 w/ Cognitive Dissonance by Reap

Reap — Sat, 14 Apr 2012 02:58:23 +0000

I did not say whether or not my nose exists, it does. I’m as sure of that as I can be. I was addressing the placement in the center of the face. The nose does not give the illusion or delusion of order to me, it does so to you.Since I understand how the nose came to be I would suggest you do the test and then tell us how much worth a severed nose has in a universe of order.

Comment on The Angry Atheist 56 w/ Cognitive Dissonance by Marius de Jess

Marius de Jess — Sat, 14 Apr 2012 01:06:45 +0000

First, I am glad that I can still write here.

————-

You say: “Selection isn’t really selection, there is no intelligence making choices as to survival. Selection refers to the effect of mutation. The nose in the middle of your face is a result of mutation and the environment it is not an example of order it just is. I’m no biologist so I can only say this is the way I understand it.”

—————–

You are making a distinction between what is real and what is not real or delusion, illusion, and therefore is of no effect whatever in the actual objective operation of your body, for example, how your nose operates.

You are saying then that the nose is not any indication of order but only an illusion or delusion of order.

Please forgive me, but there is a test to discern something to be a delusion or illusion, namely, by destroying it.

So, and again forgive me, suppose you just slit off your nose and see whether you will suffer anything at all, which you will not if the nose as a testimony to order is all delusion or illusion.

I hope to continue with our exchange of thoughts.

Marius de Jess

Comment on The Angry Atheist 56 w/ Cognitive Dissonance by Reap

Reap — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:01:17 +0000

Selection isn’t really selection, there is no intelligence making choices as to survival. Selection refers to the effect of mutation. The nose in the middle of your face is a result of mutation and the environment it is not an example of order it just is. I’m no biologist so I can only say this is the way I understand it.